Another Found List

I found this list in a parking lot on my way back from work on Thursday, May 9th at 7.37pm. I do hope that whoever lost this list remembered to talk to Mohammed at 10.00 on Saturday.

 

Posted in Found, Lists, Lost | Leave a comment

Like a Motorway

Tiger Bay by St Etienne (1994) is a criminally neglected album. I found my copy for £2 in the bargain bin of HMV in Oxford. I didn’t expect much when I played it at some ungodly hour. My jaw dropped during Urban Clearway and hit the floor when Like a Motorway started.

Although rooted in 90s dance and heavily influenced by synthpop of the 70s, Like a Motorway has an enduring timelessness (above is the single version, I prefer the album version). “Where does that tune come from?” you ask yourself. It draws a line right back to the distant past. It seems almost medieval.

Then, by chance, you hear this song. Silver Dagger by Joan Baez. You feel your gut-wrench. Is that really the same tune?

Thematically similar, Like a Motorway‘s lyrics even reference Silver Dagger.

Silver Dagger: And in her right hand, a silver dagger.
Like a Motorway: And in her right hand, she clasps a letter.

Silver Dagger was first published in the USA in 1907 and is very closely related to another song, Katie Dear which shares a similar theme and melody (here’s a version sung by a Japanese Country and Western trio). These two, in turn, derive from Drowsy Sleeper, a song first published in America in the 1850s. Here’s a recording I found on YouTube:

In turn, it seems Drowsy Sleeper has its roots in England although I can’t trace its history back further with any surety.

Like a Motorway by St Etienne is timeless precisely because it’s a song that’s always existed. It might have been played with different instruments, but Sarah Cracknell is singing the same tune that a thousand broken hearts have sung for hundreds of years.

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

The Invisible Library

Melk Library by Emgonzalez

I’m not the biggest fan of flying, but I appreciate the opportunity they give me to work. Hours on end with nothing to do but read and write! Over Christmas I had a flight long enough to read the whole of the latest Tin House as well work on redrafting a short story. Such luxury!

Airplanes are a curiously public-private space, like coffee shops or trains. You sit there, engrossed in a book but that cover acts as a beacon to others. Countless times people have struck up a conversation asking what I’m reading. It happened on that flight and we had a great chat about writing. Although you experience the contents of a book privately, the physical book is a social tool.

Next time I fly or am in a coffee shop, I’ll probably take my tablet. I can load it up with books and copies of Tin House, The New Yorker and The Paris Review. I can take so much with me, even less weight. My interaction with the content is as complete and private as before. But the social aspect of the physical book—the conversation starter cover, the coincidental meeting of someone reading your favourite book—that’s gone.

Instead of proudly displaying a jewel from my library, my library has become invisible. A furtive, hidden thing. I wonder what my bookshelves will look like in years to come. Will I even need bookshelves? For various reasons, I lost almost every book I bought between 2001-2011; does this mean my physical library will be frozen in 2001? Walking through someone’s library is to know their mind. To pick a book off a shelf is to ask about a memory.

Sure, I can scroll through someone’s digital book collection. But the physicality is gone. Music has already gone this way. When I lost all my CDs it didn’t matter: I’d already digitised them.

This is not a bad thing. It’s a different thing. I can walk the Earth with less weight. I save trees. I have access to so much more information than I ever had. I embrace change and I love my table. It’s worth noting, though, that we live in a time of seismic change in the way we relate to our personal book collections and, in turn, each other.

(Image by Emgonzalez.)

Posted in Reading | Leave a comment

Jean Baudrillard, America (1986)

Baudrillard AmericaTake a postmodern French philosopher, put him on a road trip across the USA and what have you got?

Possibly the most trite tagline for Jean Baudrillard’s America imaginable.

Both insightful and slap-dash, it’s a highly accessible work. Simulacrum meets the desert. Even though there are excursions into cities, Baudrillard keeps returning to the desert. Hyperreal America is founded on the desert—equally a place of death, of speed, of space, of disappearance.

I felt honored that, on page 50, he wrote about the city in California I used to live in:

Irvine: a new Silicon Valley. electronic factories with no openings to the outside world, like integrated circuits. A desert zone, given over to ions and electrons, a suprahuman place, the product of inhuman decision-making. By a terrible twist of irony it just had to be here, in the hills of Irvine, that they shot Planet of the Apes. (50)

Actually, they didn’t. The fifth film (last in a series that obeyed the law of diminishing returns) Escape from Planet of the Apes was filmed at the university. Not that Baudrillard cares, he’s not trying to give me a history lesson. Some of what America considers important seems curiously obscurantist and quaint (I had no idea Reagan had cancer of the nose). But the majority is filled with eye-opening (if occasionally weird or philosophically odd) perspectives:

The city was here before the freeway system, no doubt, but it now looks as though the metropolis has actually been built around this arterial network. It is the same with American reality. It was there before the screen was invented, but everything about the way it is today suggests it was invented with the screen in mind, that it is the refraction of a giant screen. (57)

 

Posted in Reading | Leave a comment

Found Lists

Here are a couple of lists I found in April 2013 in the parking lot of my local mall.

I found this one on April 23rd at 5.36pm:

Found List, April 2013

A shopping list, it reads: “Oatmeal, Grits, Rice, Whips [I can't be reading that right!], Turkey, Eggwhites, Watermellon, Ground Turkey, Sweet Potato”

And this one on April 17th, at 1.14pm.

FoundList01-Peevers

This coffee shop order is really well preserved and written on the back of Kenneth Cole receipt paper.

Posted in Lists | Leave a comment

Why I Hate Measuring Cups! (And Where They Came From.)

Fannie Farmer admires a measuring cup

I love America, my adopted home. I love everything about it. Well, alright, there’s one exception. Just one. Measuring cups.

Cooking is a passion for me. So imagine my confusion when I moved to the United States only to find that no one used kitchen scales. How can you measure anything for cooking? One of my friends advised me to buy a new tool: a set of measuring cups. This way, I was told, I could accurately measure ingredients for any recipe.

A measuring cup? Not scales? Suddenly that early internet hoax, The $250 Cookie made sense. Back in the early 90s, I received an email. It told of how a woman in America had asked for the cookie recipe at a restaurant, they’d charged her $250 for it and she couldn’t get a refund. Her “revenge” was to email the recipe to everyone she knew. One of the first instances of spam email, it cluttered up everyone’s inboxes for a week. The story, was of course, baloney but I wanted to try the recipe. The problem was that all the measurements were in cups, not ounces or grams. So I had no idea how to make it.

Now I had the answer. Americans use cups to measure food! Sadly, I’d lost the recipe years earlier but I decided to make another dessert (I forget what I made exactly). I pulled out my shiny new measuring cups. The recipe called for “1 cup walnuts, chopped”. Huh? This didn’t make sense! How many walnuts is that? If I chop the walnuts coarsely, I’d get far fewer walnuts in the cup measurement than I would if I chopped them finely. Paralysed by inaccuracy, I did my best and chopped them medium-fine.

The next instruction was worse: “2 cups flour”. Was that flour fresh out of the bag or flour that I had sifted? Because it’s been aerated, far less sifted flour fits in a cup than flour out of the bag. As a measure for solid foods, I quickly realised, this cup system was dreadful. I felt like giving up altogether when in another recipe it advised “1 cup strawberries”. Seriously? You can’t even fit them sensibly in the measure!

It took some searching online, but I found some digital scales. Weight is accurate: an ounce of walnuts weighs the same no matter how they’ve been chopped. The problem was that I couldn’t use them with American recipes: there’s no way to convert a measure by volume (cups) to a measure by weight (scales).

Ok, I thought, this cup system is disastrous for solids, but it must work for liquids, right? It’s definitely better. But better is a relative term. I was used to using a glass measuring jug with fluid ounces marked on one side and millilitres on the other. Very accurate. The problem with measuring cups is that although measuring liquid by volume makes sense, there’s no granularity when you use cups.

With a jug I can easily pop 200ml of one liquid and 275ml of another into the same recipe. With the cup I’m stuck with using whatever sizes the set of measuring cups I bought came with. One and 7/8 of a cup of water would require me to use several measuring cups (which requires more washing up) or to guess (which defeats the purpose). So I bought a jug with fluid ounces marked on one side and cups on the other. I wished it had mililitres on it too, but at this stage of desperation it seemed like a small issue.

Because the use of measuring cups in the kitchen is so distinctive to the USA, there had to be a point when Americans broke away from using scales. Why would they do that? Why go from a more to a less accurate system? It made no sense. So I did what I always do when I’m confused: I researched and tried to find out what happened.

Fannie Farmer was born in 1857 and is best known for her 1896 Boston Cooking-School Cook Book. She championed the use of measuring cups in cooking, saying that “Correct measurements are absolutely essential to insure the best results.” Before her time, it seems that American cookery was filled with imprecise measurements, based more on guesswork than science (“a dash of…”, “a piece of…”). That’s Fannie Farmer at the top of this post, admiring one of her cups.

The book made her famous and she travelled the country, lecturing and evangelising her measuring cup system. Although poor for measuring, they were convenient, cheap and you could make do with just one set of cups to measure everything in the kitchen. No need for fiddly, expensive scales.

Fannie Farmer’s legacy lives on. I have given up trying to fight it. I’ve accepted cups as a necessary evil. I love anything to do with the kitchen. I adore kitchen utensils, but it’s so hard to love my measuring cups. They sit in the drawer, frustrating me. I doubt I’ll ever love them, but maybe (just maybe), if I buy myself these Matryoshka Cups from the MoMA Store, I might start to grow fond of them. And maybe even like them. Maybe.

Posted in Cooking | Leave a comment

Trains in Queens

 

Mets-Willets Point Train Station, Flushing NYC

Mets-Willets Point LIRR station. In the top left you can see Titan II and Atlas rockets, remnants of the 1964 World’s Fair.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Posted in New York, New York World's Fairs | Leave a comment

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.